2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of IDH1 Mutation Status in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning Technique Based on Quantitative Radiomic Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also emerging AI algorithms can provide the voxel-based assessment of data obtained by histogram analysis or other methods. The voxel-based assessment of imaging data provides new quantitative information, which is invisible to human assessment and can more precisely extract and use thousands of different and new radiomic features, which are validated as the quantitative imaging biomarkers to characterize intratumoral dynamics throughout diagnosis and treatment [6063]. The second problem is the analysis of data.…”
Section: Possible Pitfalls and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also emerging AI algorithms can provide the voxel-based assessment of data obtained by histogram analysis or other methods. The voxel-based assessment of imaging data provides new quantitative information, which is invisible to human assessment and can more precisely extract and use thousands of different and new radiomic features, which are validated as the quantitative imaging biomarkers to characterize intratumoral dynamics throughout diagnosis and treatment [6063]. The second problem is the analysis of data.…”
Section: Possible Pitfalls and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDH is a very important prognostic, diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker for glioma, and triggered the integrated genomic-histological characterization of brain tumours proposed in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system 1 . Recently, some studies have shown IDH mutational status may be predicted using neuroimaging with good accuracy (between 78.2% and 92.8%) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] , and also with very good diagnostic performance when using 2-hydroxyglutarate MR spectroscopy (2HG-MRS, with a pooled 91% sensitivity and 95% specificity) 21,22 . However, neuroimaging is not yet state-of-the-art in detecting IDH mutations in glioma, which is one of the reasons tumour sampling is often still necessary, also because surgical resection/debulking is part of the current mainstay of treatment 23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not clear how the patients were selected in that study. Furthermore, the performance of previous deep learning methods on either MRI or H&E slides remains unclear because of the small sample sizes and unbalanced sample distributions in past studies [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent improvements in ML algorithms and computational power provide an attractive venue for exploring MR radiomic features, an excellent fit for ML-approach analysis that considers the large data size and multimodal nature. Therefore, ML methods have been recently explored to predict glioma genetic biomarkers from MRI radiomic features [10][11][12][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies only used conventional MRI sequences and achieved AUC ranging 0.84-0.96 [10,[22][23][24][25]30]. Others explored the added value of advanced MRI imaging, such as MR diffusion or perfusion, with mixed results [21,[26][27][28][29]31]. The highest performance of predicting IDH1 genotype with AUC of 0.96 was observed with a RF model that was trained with conventional MRI, but this study focused only on patients with glioblastomas [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%