“…It turned out that the first building, despite poor indicators, was, according to the respondents, the best room for thermal comfort, in contrast to the other two buildings. Krawczyk [5] modified the Fanger model by subtracting the value of -0.00015 to carbon dioxide, on the other hand, the authors [6] improved the Fanger model with skin temperature, which helped to more accurately predict thermal sensations in the subjects. Shin et al [7] used the discrepancy between the PMV and the TSV to analyse the effects of carbon dioxide.…”