2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01515-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of human serum albumin–drug binding affinity without albumin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, several models have been developed to study the binding between HSA and restricted drug families 45,46,47 , and a few global models have been developed based on different approaches, such as genetic function approximation, multiple linear regression, heuristic regression procedures and ant colony systems 48,49,50 . Monti et al combined molecular mechanisms (MM) and molecular dynamics (MD) with circular dichroism (CD) to identify the main interactions between ketoprofen enantiomers and the surrounding amino acids at short distances in bovine serum albumin 51 .…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, several models have been developed to study the binding between HSA and restricted drug families 45,46,47 , and a few global models have been developed based on different approaches, such as genetic function approximation, multiple linear regression, heuristic regression procedures and ant colony systems 48,49,50 . Monti et al combined molecular mechanisms (MM) and molecular dynamics (MD) with circular dichroism (CD) to identify the main interactions between ketoprofen enantiomers and the surrounding amino acids at short distances in bovine serum albumin 51 .…”
Section: Methods and Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been done to generate mathematical models to predict binding affinities to HSA from drug molecular structure, mainly for specific families of compounds. [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Since much of the data has been obtained from high performance affinity chromatography experiments, these models are usually referred as QSRR (Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships) ones, because the predicted variable is the compound retention factor in the column (K 0 HSA ). 44 Whether we call them QSRR models, or, using a more typical name, QSAR (Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships) models, the present section attempts to gather and describe the corresponding equations present in the bibliography.…”
Section: Q S a R M O D E L S F O R D R U G -B I N D I N G A F F I Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also some models derived for heterogeneous (although very small) sets of compounds in the bibliography. 51,52 In this case the binding constants were not obtained through affinity chromatography with HSA-immobilized stationary phases, but from a modified Hummer-Dryer method using purified HSA, and further analysis of the data using Scatchard plots. In a first article by these authors, a set of seven acidic drugs were studied.…”
Section: Table III Qsar Models For Drug-hsa Binding In the Bibliographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main binding forces are hydrophobic interaction and ion-ion interaction, and specific steric effects may not be important. Previously, acidic drug-HSA and basic drug-HSA binding affinities were successfully determined by a combination of reversed-phase and ionexchange liquid chromatography without albumin [15][16][17]. Guanidino groups of arginine should work as anionexchange groups and carboxyl groups of aspartic and glutamic acids should work as cation-exchange groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%