2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of horse carcass composition using linear measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, those carcasses showed an increasing fat incidence with the age raise at slaughtering (p<0.001). However, lean and bone incidence of IHDH foal carcasses reported in this paper were respectively greater and lower than that observed by Znamirowska and Stanislawczyk (2005) and Znamirowska (2005) in polish foals. In fact, they showed that lean incidence on horse carcass ranged from 68.45% to 60.63%, and was lower than what was observed in IHDH foals (68.23 to 75.83%).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, those carcasses showed an increasing fat incidence with the age raise at slaughtering (p<0.001). However, lean and bone incidence of IHDH foal carcasses reported in this paper were respectively greater and lower than that observed by Znamirowska and Stanislawczyk (2005) and Znamirowska (2005) in polish foals. In fact, they showed that lean incidence on horse carcass ranged from 68.45% to 60.63%, and was lower than what was observed in IHDH foals (68.23 to 75.83%).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…In fact, they showed that lean incidence on horse carcass ranged from 68.45% to 60.63%, and was lower than what was observed in IHDH foals (68.23 to 75.83%). However, horse represented the species with higher lean incidence compared to other species employed for meat production (Znamirowska, 2005). Horses slaughtered at 18 months were characterized by a higher percentage of fat (p<0.01) (Table 2) and a lower incidence of meat or bone or both meat and bone (p<0.01), aspects more evident on hind and fore leg, neck and briskets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013). IHDH foals showed the higher lean incidence (74.48% to 78.96%) in horse meat production if compared to results reported in other horses like Polish horses (60.63% to 68.45%) (Znamirowska 2005; Znamirowska & Stanislawczyk 2005) or Galician Mountain horses (69.70% to 70.15%) (Franco et al . 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…El porcentaje de magro y grasa total fue mayor en los animales finalizados con pienso (73 vs. 69 p<0,05; 6,68 vs. 3,25, p<0,001) que presentaron menor porcentaje de hueso, siendo la relación carne/hueso superior en los animales finalizados (3,8 vs. 2,62). No hay en la bibliografía datos relativos al despiece de canales, por lo que no es posible hacer comparaciones, debido a la edad de sacrificio y raza y tampoco es el objeto de este estudio, pero si se puede comprobar que las canales se caracterizan por tener un alto contenido en carne, mayor en aquellos animales finalizados (73,0 vs. 69,09) y superior al 68,41 mostrado por Znamirowska (2005) en caballos de 6-10 años. Por el contrario los porcentajes de las piezas nobles como solomillo y lomo, así como el sumatorio de piezas que engloba la carne de primera no fueron afectados por el sistema de explotación.…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified