2019
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07910-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Histopathologic Growth Patterns of Colorectal Liver Metastases with a Noninvasive Imaging Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most papers ( n = 28) described retrospective analyses, while four reported planned secondary analyses of prospectively acquired data [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Nineteen authors analyzed computed tomography (CT) [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], eight magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ], three positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT [ 59 , 60 , 61 ], and two multiple imaging modalities (CT and MRI; PET and MRI, respectively) [ 62 , 63 ]. Various software applications were used for texture analysis, with these being custom-made in a large proportion of cases ( n = 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Most papers ( n = 28) described retrospective analyses, while four reported planned secondary analyses of prospectively acquired data [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Nineteen authors analyzed computed tomography (CT) [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ], eight magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ], three positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT [ 59 , 60 , 61 ], and two multiple imaging modalities (CT and MRI; PET and MRI, respectively) [ 62 , 63 ]. Various software applications were used for texture analysis, with these being custom-made in a large proportion of cases ( n = 10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average radiomic quality score (RQS) [ 64 ] was in the 10 ± 6.5 (range 1–22), roughly 25% of the maximum score ( n = 36). Only four studies (16%) [ 33 , 34 , 39 , 40 ] had a score higher than 18 (>50% of the maximum score). The main limitations in quality were the following: no cost-effectiveness analysis (32 studies, 100%); lack of open-data repositories ( n = 31, 97%); no phantom calibration ( n = 31, 97%); failure to include a calibration statistic ( n = 30, 94%); lack of prospective design ( n = 28, 87%); and missing validation cohort ( n = 18, 56%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations