2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of high frequency gust response with airfoil thickness effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-analytical models have been developed to predict turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise for realistic aerofoils, that includes the effects of thickness Gershfeld (2004); Roger (2010); Glegg and Devenport (2010); Moriarty et al (2005); Lysak et al (2013); Billson (2002). This work will be discussed in section 2.1 and compared against careful measured noise data.…”
Section: Analytical and Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Semi-analytical models have been developed to predict turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise for realistic aerofoils, that includes the effects of thickness Gershfeld (2004); Roger (2010); Glegg and Devenport (2010); Moriarty et al (2005); Lysak et al (2013); Billson (2002). This work will be discussed in section 2.1 and compared against careful measured noise data.…”
Section: Analytical and Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.6. Gershfeld's correction can be rewritten in terms of an attenuation coefficient as: Lysak et al (2013);Lysak (2011) developed an empirical expression for β(t) based on timedomain calculations, accounting for the gust distortion by the mean flow around the aerofoil. In the study, Lysak considered NACA 65 aerofoils of different thickness to chord ratio in the range of 4% to 20%.…”
Section: Comparison Of Thickness-based Empirical Models For the Predimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effects of aerofoil geometry on turbulence-aerofoil interaction noise has been studied extensively (Gershfeld 2004;Roger 2010;Moriarty et al 2005;Lysak et al 2013;Gill et al 2013;Devenport et al 2010;Evers & Peake 2002;Chaitanya et al 2015a). It has been demonstrated by the authors of the current paper Haeri et al 2014;Narayanan et al 2015;Chaitanya et al 2015b;Kim et al 2016) and others that introducing leading edge serrations can be an effective method of reducing far field noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%