2023
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00529-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of hepatic lymph node metastases based on magnetic resonance imaging before and after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent surgical resection

Abstract: Background Patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) combined with hepatic lymph node (HLN) metastases have a poor prognosis. In this study, we developed and validated a model using clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters to predict HLN status before surgery. Methods A total of 104 CRLM patients undergoing hepatic lymphonodectomy with pathologically confirmed HLN status after preoperative chemotherapy were enrolled in this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discovered that short diameter of the largest lymph node after treatment were helpful in predicting the status of hepatic lymph node in CRLM patients. This finding is consistent with that of previous study, which indicated that tumor size was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis [30]. The optimal diagnostic threshold for short diameter of lymph nodes was 10 mm in our study, with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 52.5%, 94.7% and 77.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We discovered that short diameter of the largest lymph node after treatment were helpful in predicting the status of hepatic lymph node in CRLM patients. This finding is consistent with that of previous study, which indicated that tumor size was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis [30]. The optimal diagnostic threshold for short diameter of lymph nodes was 10 mm in our study, with sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 52.5%, 94.7% and 77.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%