2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of heartbeat motion with a generalized adaptive filter

Abstract: In order to perform coronary artery bypass graft surgery, a stationary heart is necessary. A human cannot achieve manual tracking of the complex heartbeat motion. Robotics technology can overcome such limitations. In the robotic-assisted beating heart surgery, the robot actively cancels heart motion by closely following a point of interest on the heart surface-a process called Active Relative Motion Canceling. As a result, surgeon can operate on the beating heart as if it is stationary. In this paper, a genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented one step adaptive filter and the generalized adaptive filter are initially proposed by Franke et al . in [9] and [10] respectively. The analysis of these predictors are extended in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented one step adaptive filter and the generalized adaptive filter are initially proposed by Franke et al . in [9] and [10] respectively. The analysis of these predictors are extended in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frank et al proposed a new Autoregressive (AR) model based adaptive prediction technique [8,9] that is less susceptible to the variation of the heart motion period and robust to noise. However, this AR model is still a linear model that cannot describe some of the nonlinear dynamics of heart motion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VX=false[xt+1,xt+2,,xt+Nfalse]T, and adaptively learns the relationship, V , using a least squares method [17]. An advantage of each of these methods is that they do not parameterize the motion, reducing the risk of not accurately characterizing the underlying dynamics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%