2022 International Conference on Cyber Resilience (ICCR) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iccr56254.2022.9995841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Heart Disease Using Naive Bayes in Comparison with KNN Based on Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thummala Gunasekhar, et al [166] compared the KNN and Naïve Bayes methods to determine their effectiveness for heart disease prediction. The Naïve Bayes method outperformed the KNN method with a superiority of 3% in accuracy.…”
Section: G Knnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thummala Gunasekhar, et al [166] compared the KNN and Naïve Bayes methods to determine their effectiveness for heart disease prediction. The Naïve Bayes method outperformed the KNN method with a superiority of 3% in accuracy.…”
Section: G Knnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effectively handling the presence of missing values in the data KNN [15], [146], [166], [212], [214] metric: minkowski distance, n_neighbor: 5, weight: distance The strength to handle outliers is due to its noninvolvement in assumptions about a specific data distribution SVM [15], [16], [146], [157] Kernel: rbf, degree of polynomial: 3, cache size: 200mb…”
Section: Disease Machine Learning Algorithm Parameter Used Reasons Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a lot of criteria performance that was conducted in comparing performance between methods in Machine Learning or Deep Learning. The comparison performance method has conducted based on Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) [8], Quality Metrics and Execution Time [9], Coefficient of Determination values and Mean Absolute Error values [12], Accuracy Value [14], [16], precision, recall, ROC Curve and PRC [15], [17], Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Square Error (MSE) [18], Cross Validation [19], Root Mean Squared Error [20], Mean Accuracy [21], Internal and External Verification [22], Accuracy [23], Accuracy, Sensitivity, dan Specificity [24], and Precision, Recall, f1 Score, RMSE, Kappa Coefficient, Matthew Correlation Coefficient, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve and Accuracy [25]. Based on a lot of the previous research, this study is a predictive measurement of ongoing events for patients who survive and is national by using the best algorithm from several algorithms.…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%