2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2003.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of halocarbon toxicity from structure: a hierarchical QSAR approach

Abstract: Mathematical structural invariants and quantum theoretical descriptors have been used extensively in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the estimation of pharmaceutical activities, biological properties, physicochemical properties, and the toxicities of chemicals. Recently our research team has explored the relative importance of various levels of chemodescriptors, i.e. topostructural (TS), topochemical (TC), geometrical (3D), and quantum theoretical descriptors, in property estimation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basak et al formulated the hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship (HiQSAR) approach for the estimation of properties, biomedicinal activities, and toxicities of chemicals from computed descriptors. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The objective of this HiQSAR/ HiQSPR research has been twofold: description and prediction. The HiQSPR formalism uses progressively more complex indices in the development of models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basak et al formulated the hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship (HiQSAR) approach for the estimation of properties, biomedicinal activities, and toxicities of chemicals from computed descriptors. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] The objective of this HiQSAR/ HiQSPR research has been twofold: description and prediction. The HiQSPR formalism uses progressively more complex indices in the development of models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of 3-D or QC descriptors after the use of TS+TC combination does not make any improvement in model quality. We previously observed this trend in different properties of other data sets [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. At this age of "big data screening and analysis" [31], this is a good news because QSARs derived from the less expensive TS+ TC combination can be effective tools in the fast and effective screening of large chemical libraries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that quantitative structure-activity/ property relationships (QSAR/QSPR) approach is successful in predicting activities, properties, and toxicities including mutagenicity (described as lnR) of aromatic and hetero-aromatic amines. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] For example, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity (described as pEC50) is well documented in the field of toxicology for organics. [13][14][15] Basak et al 16 proposed a hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship (HiQSAR) approach for the pEC50 prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%