The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2020.1729876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of groundwater level variations in coastal aquifers with tide and rainfall effects using heuristic data driven models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study's outcomes follow the studies carried out in other parts of the world to predict the groundwater level with slightly different input parameters [44,62,65,68,69,82,83], and found the performance of GAs implemented with ANN promising for the prediction of groundwater table depth in various regions. Shiri et al [84] predicted groundwater depth (GWD) fluctuations of two coastal aquifers located in Donghae City, Korea, by employing six heuristic models: boosted regression tree (BRT), random forests (RF), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), ANN, support vector machine (SVM), and gene expression programming (GEP). They found the GEP model with tide and rainfall data provided better estimates than the other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's outcomes follow the studies carried out in other parts of the world to predict the groundwater level with slightly different input parameters [44,62,65,68,69,82,83], and found the performance of GAs implemented with ANN promising for the prediction of groundwater table depth in various regions. Shiri et al [84] predicted groundwater depth (GWD) fluctuations of two coastal aquifers located in Donghae City, Korea, by employing six heuristic models: boosted regression tree (BRT), random forests (RF), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), ANN, support vector machine (SVM), and gene expression programming (GEP). They found the GEP model with tide and rainfall data provided better estimates than the other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the authors gure out that groundwater extraction for agricultural usage is the main driving force for aquifer storage changes. In another study, Shiri et al (2020) used six AI-based models, ANN, BT, MARS, RF, GEP, and SVM, in a coastal aquifer to forecast GWL, and they gured out that GEP's outcomes were the superior one. Osman et al's (2021) study showed that the Xgboost model had the best results among other used AI-based models such as ANN and support vector regression to predict GWL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their success in GWL modelling efficiently with less data, these techniques suffer from some shortcomings. For instance, the ANN also exhibits high sensitivity to the trained data, overfitting problem and dependence on hidden neurons and poor forecasting (Shiri et al 2020). The performance of SVM depends on the optimal selection of kernel functions (Sheikh Khozani et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%