2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during various activities of daily living

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
152
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, it can be justifiable to solve this over-determinacy by simply discarding acceleration measurements for one or more segments in the 5 model. When this is not possible, however, the dynamic inconsistency arising from these two issues can be solved by introducing residual forces and moments in the model to obtain dynamic equilibrium [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In some cases, it can be justifiable to solve this over-determinacy by simply discarding acceleration measurements for one or more segments in the 5 model. When this is not possible, however, the dynamic inconsistency arising from these two issues can be solved by introducing residual forces and moments in the model to obtain dynamic equilibrium [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, dynamic consistency can be improved by deriving the GRF&Ms from the model kinematics and segment dynamical properties only, which is commonly known as the top-down approach [17,20]. This method has traditionally been limited by the fact that the inverse dynamics problem becomes indeterminate during double-contact phases, where the system forms a closed kinetic chain [19,21]. In recent years, however, several studies have provided solutions to this issue [19,[21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations