1996
DOI: 10.1029/96gl00259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of geomagnetic storms from solar wind data using Elman Recurrent Neural Networks

Abstract: In order to accurately predict geomagnetic storms, we exploit Elman recurrent neural networks to predict the Dst index one hour in advance only from solar wind data. The input parameters are the interplanetary magnetic field z‐component Bz (GSM), the solar wind plasma number density n and the solar wind velocity V. The solar wind data and the geomagnetic index Dst are selected from observations during the period 1963 to 1987, covering 8620h and containing 97 storms and 10 quiet periods. These data are grouped … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geomagnetic disturbances are likely to be one of the largest sources of deviation between observed and modelled geomagnetic ®eld values. In recent years methods of predicting geomagnetic storms and substorms in near real-time from solar wind data using nonlinear ®lters (Vassiliadis et al, 1995) and neural networks (Lundstedt and Wintoft, 1994;Wu and Lundstedt, 1996;Weigel et al, 1999) have been developed. However, such predictions are limited to hours, or at best days, into the future and require observed solar wind data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Geomagnetic disturbances are likely to be one of the largest sources of deviation between observed and modelled geomagnetic ®eld values. In recent years methods of predicting geomagnetic storms and substorms in near real-time from solar wind data using nonlinear ®lters (Vassiliadis et al, 1995) and neural networks (Lundstedt and Wintoft, 1994;Wu and Lundstedt, 1996;Weigel et al, 1999) have been developed. However, such predictions are limited to hours, or at best days, into the future and require observed solar wind data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arti®cial neural networks (ANNs) are a branch of AI methods which are proving particularly successful in solar-terrestrial time series prediction and pattern recognition; they appear to be especially e ective in modelling the time development of irregular processes (Koons and Gorney, 1991;Lundstedt, 1992;Gorney et al, 1993;Lundstedt and Wintoft, 1994;Williscroft and Poole, 1996;Wu and Lundstedt, 1996; Sutcli e, 1997; Weigel et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of magnetic storms, including the energy content in the ring current and the coupling to the solar wind, has been successfully modeled in the past as a simple, nonlinear, input-output system, with solar wind VBz as the input and Dst as the output [Gonzalez et al, 1994;Valdivia et al, 1996;Wu and Lundstedt, 1996], where V is the x component of the solar wind velocity and Bz the z component of the solar wind magnetic field. We expect that a more complete understanding of the nonlinear behavior of the ring current could be reached after a more careful analysis of the evolution of its spatial structure, namely, its spariotemporal behavior.…”
Section: -0227/99 / 1999j A90015250900mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low-dimensional dynamical model is then applied to new SW time-series to predict the geomagnetic response. In another approach, neural networks are trained on historical SW data and geomagnetic indices and are then applied to new input SW time-series [e.g., Lundstedt, 1992;Hernandez et al, 1993;Wu and Lundstedt, 1996;Wu et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%