2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Gastric Cancer Development by Serum Pepsinogen Test and Helicobacter pylori Seropositivity in Eastern Asians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundTo identify high-risk groups for gastric cancer in presumptively healthy populations, several studies have investigated the predictive ability of the pepsinogen test, H. Pylori antibodies, and a risk-prediction model based on these two tests. To investigate whether these tests accurately predict gastric cancer development, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed and other electronic databases were searched for cohort studies published in English or Japanese from January 1985 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
8
81
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study based on 3328 participants concluded that a combination of serum PG levels and H. pylori antibody test is useful for detecting gastric neoplasms based on Correa's cascade, with a slow gastric carcinogenesis pathway progressing from gastric adenoma with low grade dysplasia to Lauren's intestinaltype GC. The sensitivity and specificity of these two biomarkers have been reported to be 90-95% and 84.6-89.7%, respectively [13].…”
Section: Gastro Panel a Reliable Non-invasive Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study based on 3328 participants concluded that a combination of serum PG levels and H. pylori antibody test is useful for detecting gastric neoplasms based on Correa's cascade, with a slow gastric carcinogenesis pathway progressing from gastric adenoma with low grade dysplasia to Lauren's intestinaltype GC. The sensitivity and specificity of these two biomarkers have been reported to be 90-95% and 84.6-89.7%, respectively [13].…”
Section: Gastro Panel a Reliable Non-invasive Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pylori antibody-positive/PG-positive subjects in group C, and anti-H. pylori antibody-negative/PG-positive subjects were in group D. Specifically, multivariate meta-analyses suggested that group A had a lower risk than groups B/C/D and that group B had a lower risk compared with groups C/D [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…PG concentrations have been used with a set of recommended cutoff values to diagnose chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) (PG I B 70 ng/ml and PG I/II B 3.0 ng/ml) [7]. Therefore, gastric cancer risk can be evaluated by measuring the serum anti-H. pylori antibody titer in combination with PG levels [8][9][10], and this system of risk prediction using the anti-H. pylori antibody serological test and the PG test is known as the ABC classification system in Japan [8][9][10]. Subjects with negative test results for either the anti-H. pylori antibody serology test or the PG test were classified in group A, anti-H. pylori antibodypositive/PG-negative subjects were in group B, anti-H.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, a positive result for serum H. pylori antibody indicates current H. pylori infection. Thus, a gastric cancer screening method using serum anti- H. pylori antibody and PG tests has been applied in some health check-up settings in Japan for screening high risk subjects of gastric cancer, and the method is called as the “ABC method” [6,7,8,11,12]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%