2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2004.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of gas solubility in battery formulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the vast majority of CO 2 accumulates in the head space of our OEMS cell (≈98%) rather than in the electrolyte (≈2%), which is actually an important prerequisite for quantitative mass spectrometry (when sampling the gas phase representative for the entire gas amount evolved in the cell). Since the Henry's law constants of H 2 , C 2 H 4 , CO, and Ar are even higher, 67 this requirement is closely met for all gases in this study. Generally speaking, the accuracy of mass spectrometer experiments for battery applications depends on the V el /V gas ratio and thus on the individual cell design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This means that the vast majority of CO 2 accumulates in the head space of our OEMS cell (≈98%) rather than in the electrolyte (≈2%), which is actually an important prerequisite for quantitative mass spectrometry (when sampling the gas phase representative for the entire gas amount evolved in the cell). Since the Henry's law constants of H 2 , C 2 H 4 , CO, and Ar are even higher, 67 this requirement is closely met for all gases in this study. Generally speaking, the accuracy of mass spectrometer experiments for battery applications depends on the V el /V gas ratio and thus on the individual cell design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Such underestimations can also be seen in a recent COSMO-RS calculation of CO 2 solubility in organic carbonate solvents. [16] Herein, we attempt to overcome the above deficiency by expressing gas solubility in terms of the chemical potential of the solute molecule in its gas phase m ig (T), defined at a given (low) reference pressure, for example P 0 = 1 bar (1 bar = 10 5 Pa). The chemical potential of the gas phase at a general pressure P can then be written as: Equating the left-hand-side of Equation (1) and the righthand-side of Equation (4) yields the following (nonlinear) equation for PA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (x, T):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge for the present application is that the solute species (CO 2 ) is dissolving not from the solid or liquid, but from the gas phase. Although, there is a standard prescription of computing gas solubility with COSMO‐RS that involves the experimental vapor pressure, this can lead to a severe overestimation of CO 2 solubility at a given pressure and temperature as compared to experimental results . Instead, we have shown that the following equation works better with consistent accuracy: P=P0ϕ(P,T)xexp[{μsolution*(x,T)μig*(T)}/knormalBT] where x is the molar solubility at pressure P and temperature T , ϕ(P,T) is the fugacity coefficient of the dissolving gas, and μ ig * is the dilute‐limit pseudo‐chemical potential of the ideal dissolving gas defined at a low reference pressure of P 0 = 1 bar.…”
Section: Examples Of Molecular Modeling In Carbon Capturementioning
confidence: 94%