2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.03.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of functional properties of registered chickpea samples using FT-IR spectroscopy and chemometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curves at this particular absorption regions were quite lower in VE samples as compared to those observed in FR and control samples. Our results are in agreement with the findings of Kadiroğlu et al (2018), who characterized registered chickpea varieties of Turkish origin based on functional properties and FTIR spectral characteristics.…”
Section: Ftir Spectral Featuressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The curves at this particular absorption regions were quite lower in VE samples as compared to those observed in FR and control samples. Our results are in agreement with the findings of Kadiroğlu et al (2018), who characterized registered chickpea varieties of Turkish origin based on functional properties and FTIR spectral characteristics.…”
Section: Ftir Spectral Featuressupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This legume contains 41 to 47% carbohydrates, 14% to 18% dietary fiber, and a considerable amount of proteins (15 to 29%). Furthermore, the functional properties of chickpea protein flours or extracts were noted by various researchers due to the fact that proteins, hydrolysates, and peptides contain polyphenols in considerable proportions, with important antioxidant activities based on free radical uptake and chelating abilities of metals (Kadiroğlu, Aydemir, & Akcakaya, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal models were evaluated through crossvalidation (CV) and external validation. The accuracy of the models calibrated was evaluated through the values obtained regarding prediction error sums of squares (PRESS), and the determination coefficients observed between analytical and predicted values (R 2 ), which were calculated for both the calibration (R 2 c) and validation (R 2 v) sets, bias values, which should be close to zero [8,9], and residual prediction deviation (RPD). The contents in protein, amino acids, total phenols, and in vitro antioxidant activity, were assessed in triplicate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%