2021
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of forest fire using ensemble method

Abstract: In this paper we consider the application of ensemble classification method, which is called as the Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) method, to predict the occurrences of forest fire. To illustrate the method, we consider the application of the method using the same public data set, which has been used in the previous studies, but the ensemble approach is not considered in these studies yet. We also compare the performance of the ensemble method with several other classical classification methods, such as the Deci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hakim et al [90] employed only AdaBoost and LogitBoost algorithms, while Arabameri et al [91] tested VIKOR and Cforest models to create land subsidence susceptibility maps. Rosadi and Andriyani [57] applied the AdaBoost algorithm to predict the forest-fre occurrence and compared it with classical classifcation methods such as SVM (support vector machine) and decision tree methods. Michael et al [58] investigated long-term vegetation condition efects on wildfre risk mapping by applying RF,…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Of The Wildfre Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hakim et al [90] employed only AdaBoost and LogitBoost algorithms, while Arabameri et al [91] tested VIKOR and Cforest models to create land subsidence susceptibility maps. Rosadi and Andriyani [57] applied the AdaBoost algorithm to predict the forest-fre occurrence and compared it with classical classifcation methods such as SVM (support vector machine) and decision tree methods. Michael et al [58] investigated long-term vegetation condition efects on wildfre risk mapping by applying RF,…”
Section: Evaluation and Comparison Of The Wildfre Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te analysis was made using fve forest fre risk factors, and it was seen that the model and the actual fre points overlapped. Rosadi and Andriyani [57] compared the AdaBoost algorithm with decision tree and SVM method to predict the occurrence of forest fres. Te study explained that fuzzy cmeans clustering and AdaBoost methods provided good results in predicting forest fres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 21st century, the global frequency and harm of forest fire activity have attracted wide attention from the international community [7][8][9]. Thus, the application of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data [10] or high-precision image data [11] for forest fires has been gradually enhanced to improve forest fire monitoring, modeling, and prediction [12,13] as well as to improve forest fire prevention and control capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining all factors into a general fire danger parameter is usually conducted using GIS operations such as overlay and raster algebra (Akbulak et al 2018;Yankovich et al 2019), with the recent addition of machine learning, neural networks (Bui et al 2018) and big data (Piralilou et al 2022) technologies. Modern methods have advanced to using ensembles of different techniques with the selection of the most optimal and accurate results (Rosadi and Andriyani 2021). In Russia, methods for fire prevention and fire danger assessment are currently developed for three major areas:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%