2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of fluctuation loads based on GARCH family-CatBoost-CNNLSTM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the predictive effect of GRU. To facilitate the comparison of prediction effects, this section also used single models to study students’ learning performance [ 32 ]. Table 5 shows the R 2 value of each model’s prediction results under the RF and FA model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the predictive effect of GRU. To facilitate the comparison of prediction effects, this section also used single models to study students’ learning performance [ 32 ]. Table 5 shows the R 2 value of each model’s prediction results under the RF and FA model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and it is interested in categorical features. It also has higher accuracy than traditional Boosting frameworks (Zeng et al, 2023).…”
Section: Categorical Boosting (Catboost)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical techniques related to time series include pattern recognition, quadratic estimation, probabilistic modeling and weighted multimodel forecasting [5,[29][30][31] of which most focused on the impact of weather [8,9,24,32]. Regarding to time series the most used models for load forecasting are those of regression and autoregression.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%