2008
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.3.2.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Flatwater Kayaking Performance

Abstract: Purpose: To determine the relative importance of anthropometric and physiological attributes for performance in the 1000-m, 500-m, and 200-m flatwater kayaking events. Methods: Eighteen competitive male kayakers completed performance trials over the 3 distances and a battery of anthropometric and physiological tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
70
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past few years, research into the relationship between anthropometry and performance has increased (Gabbett and Georgieff, 2007; Mielgo-Ayuso et al, 2015). In most sports, the athletes’ overall status may be determined by means of general and specific field tests, since a strong correlation has been consistently reported between the fitness level and the individual performance attained (Pyne et al, 2006; van Someren and Howatson, 2008). Traditionally, the determination of a physical profile in a given sport involves the use of predictive testing as a measure of power and strength (Cronin and Hansen, 2005), speed (Gabbett and Georgieff, 2007), aerobic fitness (Leone et al, 2002) or flexibility (Simoneau, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, research into the relationship between anthropometry and performance has increased (Gabbett and Georgieff, 2007; Mielgo-Ayuso et al, 2015). In most sports, the athletes’ overall status may be determined by means of general and specific field tests, since a strong correlation has been consistently reported between the fitness level and the individual performance attained (Pyne et al, 2006; van Someren and Howatson, 2008). Traditionally, the determination of a physical profile in a given sport involves the use of predictive testing as a measure of power and strength (Cronin and Hansen, 2005), speed (Gabbett and Georgieff, 2007), aerobic fitness (Leone et al, 2002) or flexibility (Simoneau, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Además, algunos trabajos han encontrado correlaciones significativas de las dimensiones antropométricas de los kayakistas con el rendimiento en agua, en diferentes distancias. La talla sentado y el perímetro mesoesternal han sido correlacionados de forma significativa con el tiempo en 1000 m (Fry & Morton); el perímetro mesoesternal y el diámetro biepicondíleo del húmero con el rendimiento en 500 m (van Someren & Howatson, 2008); y los perímetros del brazo, brazo contraído, antebrazo y mesoesternal, junto con el diámetro biepicondíleo del húmero con el tiempo en 200 m (van Someren & Palmer).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…In 500 m kayak fl at water race, 4 km individual pursuit (track cycling), 400 m swimming and 400−1 500 m track running, best predictors were lactate threshold and peak oxygen defi cit [ 4 , 7 , 43 ] , peak workload [ 14 ] , isokinetic and isometric parameters and fatigue index over 30 s [ 41 ] . For 200 m kayak race (~1 min duration), anthropometric characteristics also entered the model of performance prediction, apart from anaerobic power and work parameters [ 41 ] . When typical sprint races were considered (conventionally, duration of up to 30 s), variables related to highintensity exercise were the sole performance predictors.…”
Section: Searching For Accurate Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%