2009
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2010.12.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Femur Bone Geometry using Anthropometric Data of Indian Population: A Numerical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be seen that the implants designed for western skeletons occupy much more space in the Indian femoral head and neck [18]. There were no significant differences on right & left NSA in the present study which was similar to most of the other studies [7,[18][19][20]. NSA are characteristically very high (150°) in neonatal modern humans & then gradually decrease during development, reaching adult values during adolescence [21,22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can also be seen that the implants designed for western skeletons occupy much more space in the Indian femoral head and neck [18]. There were no significant differences on right & left NSA in the present study which was similar to most of the other studies [7,[18][19][20]. NSA are characteristically very high (150°) in neonatal modern humans & then gradually decrease during development, reaching adult values during adolescence [21,22].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Femur implants are available in standard sizes of diameter of the femoral head & neck shaft angle. However, there is discrepancy as regards the measurement of the parameters [7]. Undersized or overhanging femoral implants could lead to altered soft-tissue tensioning & altered patella femoral stresses [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed a higher neck shaft angle in both groups, which were in contrast to that noted by Siwach et al 13 . Our findings, however, were comparable to those reported by Sengodan et al 17 , Deshmukh et al 18 and Saikia et al 19 wherein they reported higher neck shaft angles for the south, west and north-eastern Indian population, respectively. Anderson et al 20 studied inter-populational variation in human femoral neck shaft angles across 30 modern, historic and prehistoric human population samples and concluded that urban population have a higher neck shaft angle as compared to the non-mechanised rural population.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our data showed that the average horizontal offset was 3.85 cm and 3.57 cm in male and female respectively. TR Deshmukh et al, [15] in 2010 showed that the mean HO was around 3. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%