2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of fatigue crack initiation life in railheads using finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the element size of the mesh has a basic role in the deference of the deflection values between the Zimmermann method and FE model. Ma et al [37], El-sayed et al [38], and Boussalia and Bellaouar [39] concluded that by decreasing the element size, the accuracy increased, but the computational time also increased. El-sayed et al [38] and Prakoso [32] verified their numerical models, by using ABAQUS and ANSYS software programs, with the Zimmermann method.…”
Section: Zimmermann Methods Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the element size of the mesh has a basic role in the deference of the deflection values between the Zimmermann method and FE model. Ma et al [37], El-sayed et al [38], and Boussalia and Bellaouar [39] concluded that by decreasing the element size, the accuracy increased, but the computational time also increased. El-sayed et al [38] and Prakoso [32] verified their numerical models, by using ABAQUS and ANSYS software programs, with the Zimmermann method.…”
Section: Zimmermann Methods Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [37], El-sayed et al [38], and Boussalia and Bellaouar [39] concluded that by decreasing the element size, the accuracy increased, but the computational time also increased. El-sayed et al [38] and Prakoso [32] verified their numerical models, by using ABAQUS and ANSYS software programs, with the Zimmermann method. It was found that the difference between El-sayed et al [38] and the Zimmermann method was 0.82%, and the difference between Prakoso [32] and the Zimmermann method was about 0.3%.…”
Section: Zimmermann Methods Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical studies are usually based on the analytic Hertzian solution [12], semi-analytic FASTSIM algorithm [13,14] and the finite element (FEM) simulations. The FEM simulation of stresses in the wheel rail interaction system is presented in studies [15][16][17]. An approach for determining a critical size for RCF (Rail Contact Fatigue) initiation from rail surface defects is presented in [18].…”
Section: Figure 1 Representation Of a Rail Head Defect [8]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e results show that the effect of notch angles on crack propagation increased with notch depth. El-sayed et al [16] introduced a threedimensional explicit FEM combined with the critical plane approach and multiaxial low cyclic fatigue mode to predict crack orientation and fatigue crack extension. Xue [17] employed FEM to analyze the crack growth mechanisms in the process of zirconia ceramics cutting, which was used for optimization design of process parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%