2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14041033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Extreme Wind Speed for Offshore Wind Farms Considering Parametrization of Surface Roughness

Abstract: Large-scale offshore wind farms (OWF) are under construction along the southeastern coast of China, an area with a high typhoon incidence. Measured data and typhoon simulation model are used to improve the reliability of extreme wind speed (EWS) forecasts for OWF affected by typhoons in this paper. Firstly, a 70-year historical typhoon record database is statistically analyzed to fit the typhoon parameters probability distribution functions, which is used to sample key parameters when employing Monte Carlo Sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the roughness length under open sea conditions is smaller (i.e., 0.0002), the studies conducted by Frank et al ( 2000 ) and Barthelmie ( 2001 ) both show that, when wind speed is extrapolated to heights greater than 10 m above sea level, variability in the sea surface roughness length is too small to have a noticeable impact on wind resources at typical hub heights (Barthelmie et al 2007 ). As this value is widely used in other studies (e.g., Ma et al 2021 ), it will also be used here to ensure consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the roughness length under open sea conditions is smaller (i.e., 0.0002), the studies conducted by Frank et al ( 2000 ) and Barthelmie ( 2001 ) both show that, when wind speed is extrapolated to heights greater than 10 m above sea level, variability in the sea surface roughness length is too small to have a noticeable impact on wind resources at typical hub heights (Barthelmie et al 2007 ). As this value is widely used in other studies (e.g., Ma et al 2021 ), it will also be used here to ensure consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical approaches, which are based on a detailed physical description of the atmosphere, used meteorological data such as air temperature, topography, and pressure to predict wind speed, thus leading to intricate calculations and high costs [1]. Statistical methods, such as Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model, Seasonal ARIMA (SARIMA), Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) model, and Monte Carlo Simulation [2], predict wind speed on the premise of linear assumption and are more accurate than physical methods [3,4]. However, the variation of wind speed contains significant nonlinear and chaotic characteristics, and it is usually difficult to accurately and effectively predict the future wind speed simply by applying these methods or models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%