2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0551-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Engineering Properties of Basalt Rock in Jordan Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the obtained equation for PLT is in good agreement with the one derived by Read et al (1980). Similarly, the derived equation for UPV is somehow close to the obtained equation of Aldeeky and Al Hattamleh (2018), however, in their case the rock used was basalt. Finally, the obtained equation for SHRT is in fair agreement with the derived equation of Tandon and Gupta (2015), however they used quartzite rock.…”
Section: Estimation Of Ucs From Plt Upv and Shrtsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Furthermore, the obtained equation for PLT is in good agreement with the one derived by Read et al (1980). Similarly, the derived equation for UPV is somehow close to the obtained equation of Aldeeky and Al Hattamleh (2018), however, in their case the rock used was basalt. Finally, the obtained equation for SHRT is in fair agreement with the derived equation of Tandon and Gupta (2015), however they used quartzite rock.…”
Section: Estimation Of Ucs From Plt Upv and Shrtsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Similarly, mafic rocks have higher UPV OD values (Figure 4e) with R 2 = 0.90 when compared to felsic rocks, as reported by Behn and Kelemen [47]. Aldeeky and Al Hattamleh [48], Ercikdi, et al [49], Gomez-Heras, et al [50], Selçuk and Nar [51], and Yılmaz, et al [52] stated that using UPV and thorough petrography could evaluate the fractures and compactness of rocks. Yılmaz, Ercikdi, Karaman, and Külekçi [52] found a link between specific gravity and UPV, demonstrating that compact rocks had higher UPV values.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Other differences between the numerical samples and natural samples include (1) the numerical samples have a uniform pore size (Figure 1), which is not the case for natural samples (Figure 2), (2) the pores in our numerical samples are either circular or elliptical (Figure 1), whereas pores in natural samples can be oddly shaped (Figure 2), (3) volcanic rocks typically contain microcracks (Figure 2), which are not present in the numerical samples (Figure 1), and (4) all of the porosity in our numerical samples is isolated (Figure 1), whereas natural volcanic rocks can contain pores that are connected by other pores, pore throats, and microcracks; Figure 2). (2012), Wedekind et al (2013), Karakuş and Akatay (2013), Hashiba and Fakui (2015), Siratovich et al (2015), Fener and Ince (2015), Ündül and Er (2017), Yavuz et al (2017), Lamb et al (2017), Malik et al (2017), Aldeeky and Hattamleh (2018), Zorn et al (2018), Hornby et al (2019), Harnett et al (2019), Moon and Yang (2000), Yasar and Komurlu (2020), and Kendrick et al (2021).…”
Section: Comparisons With Previously Published Laboratory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%