2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of en-route complications during interfacility transport by outcome predictive scores in ED

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MEWS has preliminarily standardized the EWS, which reduced the prediction error due to the various standards and inconsistent weight of individual parameter. The prediction accuracy of disease progression and prognosis has been improved 8–10 . However, the sensitivity of the MEWS was relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MEWS has preliminarily standardized the EWS, which reduced the prediction error due to the various standards and inconsistent weight of individual parameter. The prediction accuracy of disease progression and prognosis has been improved 8–10 . However, the sensitivity of the MEWS was relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction accuracy of disease progression and prognosis has been improved. [8][9][10] However, the sensitivity of the MEWS was relatively low. In 2012, the Royal College of Physicians in the United Kingdom has developed NEWS, taking into account the oxygen saturations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies were carried out in the wards (n = 19) and in the emergency units (n = 22), one in the operating room, one in the pre-hospital environment, one in the oncology unit (Young et al, 2014) or for transfer patient in ED (Wong et al, 2016). In emergency MEWS was a good predictor in 11 studies, and in ward the score has a good performance in 10 studies.…”
Section: In-hospital Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%