2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2014.6856508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of driver intended path at intersections

Abstract: The complexity of situations occurring at intersections is demanding on the cognitive abilities of drivers. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are intended to assist particularly in those situations. However, for adequate system reaction strategies it is essential to develop situation assessment. Especially the driver's intention has to be estimated. So, the criticality can be inferred and efficient intervention strategies can take action. In this paper, we present a prediction framework based on Hidden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manually engineered models fail to scale to many different traffic scenarios, which motivated the use of machine learning models as alternatives, such as Hidden Markov Model [22], Bayesian networks [23], or Gaussian Processes [24]. In recent Kitani et al [26] used inverse optimal control to predict pedestrian paths by considering scene semantics, however the existing IRL methods are inefficient for real-time applications.…”
Section: B Machine-learned Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manually engineered models fail to scale to many different traffic scenarios, which motivated the use of machine learning models as alternatives, such as Hidden Markov Model [22], Bayesian networks [23], or Gaussian Processes [24]. In recent Kitani et al [26] used inverse optimal control to predict pedestrian paths by considering scene semantics, however the existing IRL methods are inefficient for real-time applications.…”
Section: B Machine-learned Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For highways, this set usually consists of lane change left, lane change right, and keep lane (e.g., [7], [8]). For intersections, the desired route is mostly represented by the turning directions left, right, and straight (e.g., [5], [6]). Besides the intention of a lane change or the desired route, more detailed intentions can be distinguished.…”
Section: A Intention Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between traffic participants are often not considered (e.g., [7], [5], [2], [3]). When the motion of multiple vehicles is interdependent, however, this may result in inaccurate predictions, especially for longer prediction horizons (e.g., if a vehicle approaching an intersection has to decelerate because of a slow vehicle in front, without considering interactions, it might be misleadingly inferred that it intends to turn).…”
Section: A Intention Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are limited in that the Gaussian probability models and kinematic transitions assume cars roughly follow a known trajectory. More sophisticated models allow for multiple maneuvers [22] which can be done by including road information (either heuristically or learned for particular intersections [23]) to allow for multiple possible maneuvers. More recent work in vehicle prediction is starting to consider the interactions between multiple vehicles [24], [25].…”
Section: Application To Autonomous Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%