2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.045507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Dislocation Cores in Aluminum from Density Functional Theory

Abstract: The strain field of isolated screw and edge dislocation cores in aluminum are calculated using density-functional theory and a flexible boundary condition method. Nye tensor density contours and differential displacement fields are used to accurately bound Shockley partial separation distances. Our results of 5-7.5 A (screw) and 7.0-9.5 A (edge) eliminate uncertainties resulting from the wide range of previous results based on Peierls-Nabarro and atomistic methods. Favorable agreement of the predicted cores wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
117
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The edge dislocation core was computed by previously [80] and corresponds to the structure shown in Fig. 1a.…”
Section: Al-mn Solid Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The edge dislocation core was computed by previously [80] and corresponds to the structure shown in Fig. 1a.…”
Section: Al-mn Solid Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of possible stable dislocation cores and their corresponding atomicscale structures are not known in advance. A coherent strategy is therefore indispensable to combine the experimental imaging with comprehensive theoretical simulations in a self-consistent global optimization scheme 19,20 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical model from dislocation theory for stacking fault widths does not consistently fit the experimental data for all metals [9,21]. MD is the current numerical choice for core calculations; however, results are dependent on the interatomic potential used in the calculations [9,[22][23][24][25]. Figure 2a shows the relationship between w 0 , as calculated with PFDD, in relation to the normalized intrinsic SFE γ I /μb.…”
Section: Extended Dislocationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (c) 11 and (c) 22 are the in-plane normal strain components in the x 1 and x 2 directions, and (c) 33 is the out-of-plane normal strain component, normal to the interface plane in the x 3 direction. The elastic moduli near the interface are set equal to the bulk elastic moduli.…”
Section: (I) Misfit Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%