“…Compared with recent studies (Hamdine et al, 2015;Heidar et al, 2015;Nardo et al, 2009;Polyzos et al, 2013), the AMH cut-off value predicting high and normal ovarian response in the current study (2.6 ng/ml) is lower (Hamdine et al, 2015: 4.5 ng/ml; Heidar et al, 2015: 3.4 ng/ml;Nardo et al, 2009: 3.75 ng/ml; Polyzos et al, 2013: 3.52 ng/ml), which suggests that the utilization of AMH for high ovarian response should be tailored for the Chinese population. On the other hand, the AMH cutoff value predicting low and normal ovarian response (1.1 ng/ml) was similar to previous studies (Hamdine et al, 2015: 0.8 ng/ml; Heidar et al, 2015: 1.2 ng/ml; Nardo et al, 2009: 1.0 ng/ml; Polyzos et al, 2013: 1.37 ng/ml). Additionally, Ficicioglu et al (2014) suggested that AMH cut-off values ≤1 ng/ml may be appropriate for low ovarian response prediction.…”