2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height. Background and validation using ground and remote sensing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study incorporated numerous spectral features computed using the blue, green, red, rededge and near infrared bands (e.g., indices available at [57][58][59][60]), structural features (e.g., available at [44,61]) and canopy fraction cover [62], as well as a number of custom/adopted features (e.g., cummulative NDVI, canopy width, canopy area and canopy volume above cordon). A correlation analysis of each spectral and structural feature was performed with respect to the ground measured k c for all the timepoints combined.…”
Section: Spectral and Structural Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study incorporated numerous spectral features computed using the blue, green, red, rededge and near infrared bands (e.g., indices available at [57][58][59][60]), structural features (e.g., available at [44,61]) and canopy fraction cover [62], as well as a number of custom/adopted features (e.g., cummulative NDVI, canopy width, canopy area and canopy volume above cordon). A correlation analysis of each spectral and structural feature was performed with respect to the ground measured k c for all the timepoints combined.…”
Section: Spectral and Structural Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is similar to Hughes et al (2013), which also incorporated stochasticity in terms of irrigation requirements distributed in time, in Dutta et al (2017), and in HYPE, the reference hydrological model for Sweden (SMHI, 2020c). Johnson et al (2016) analysed the differences between irrigation following standard practices and irrigation based on decision support models that incorporate information on ET, such as the NASA SIMS model (Melton et al, 2012;Pereira et al, 2020). Based on two years of field data collected for head lettuce and broccoli using a randomized block design, the authors found that standard practices lead to an increase in water consumption between 26 and 40% for lettuce and between 39 and 51% for broccoli, as compared to ET-based irrigation management strategies based on data from SIMS.…”
Section: Irrigation Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, researchers and institutions have been active in developing decision support systems based on simulation and optimization models, or satellite data observations, or hybrid approaches to provide guidelines on optimal irrigation and nutrient applications and thus inform smart farming management. The NASA Satellite Irrigation Management Support (SIMS) system (Melton et al, 2012;Pereira et al, 2020) integrates Earth observation data from Landsat and MODIS with meteorological observations to generate daily maps of evapotranspiration (ET) and 8-day map of crop coefficients for millions of hectares of farmland in the western United States (US). OpenET (OpenET, 2021) has implemented six satellite-based ET models on the Google Earth Engine platform (Gorelick et al, 2017) to make daily, monthly and annual ET data for the western US easily available at field scales (30m x 30m per pixel) via a web-based UI and application programming interface (API).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches exist for estimating ET 0 [10][11][12][13][14], including those based on a single meteorological variable, such as air temperature [15], solar radiation [16], or mass transfer [17] using pan evaporation. However, the aforementioned methods are case-study specific and therefore are not generalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%