2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of crack shape in a cylindrical bar under combined fatigue tension and torsion loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engineering approaches exist to account for kinked cracks 36 (i.e., planar 2-D deflection from the Mode I path) and complex crack fronts 37 (i.e., planar but non-straight/non-elliptical through thickness), but fully 3-D crack paths that include twist [38][39][40][41] (i.e., non-planar) are rarely considered or characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering approaches exist to account for kinked cracks 36 (i.e., planar 2-D deflection from the Mode I path) and complex crack fronts 37 (i.e., planar but non-straight/non-elliptical through thickness), but fully 3-D crack paths that include twist [38][39][40][41] (i.e., non-planar) are rarely considered or characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies analyzed the cyclic crack propagation under various mixed‐mode loads—axial tension–compression, pure torsional, and multiaxial in phase loads 12–15 . This research discovered the mode‐I load to be the most detrimental, causing the highest CGR and the fastest failure, whereas the pure cyclic torsional load led to the most durable lives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%