2005
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of coronary events in a low incidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation

Abstract: The CUORE Project predictive equation showed better accuracy of the FHS and PROCAM equations, overcoming frequently reported risk overestimates. The CUORE equation may be adopted to identify men with high coronary risk in Italy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
158
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
158
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these prediction models stratify patients according to different hard clinical end-points (events in the CUORE model and mortality in the SCORE model), they are assumed to be largely concordant and are both currently recommended for CV risk stratification by national [24] and [25] and European [13] guidelines. Therefore, given persistent uncertainties on reliability of risk classification based on conventional risk factors alone [2] and [3], routine ABI measurement appears to be an easy and reliable tool for identification of high risk subjects irrespective of conventional risk models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these prediction models stratify patients according to different hard clinical end-points (events in the CUORE model and mortality in the SCORE model), they are assumed to be largely concordant and are both currently recommended for CV risk stratification by national [24] and [25] and European [13] guidelines. Therefore, given persistent uncertainties on reliability of risk classification based on conventional risk factors alone [2] and [3], routine ABI measurement appears to be an easy and reliable tool for identification of high risk subjects irrespective of conventional risk models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global individual CVD risk was calculated applying the risk equations of the CUORE project (13,14). Subjects older than 69 years or with previous cardiovascular events were excluded from this analysis.…”
Section: Definition Of Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population-based reports in older populations (1, 2) suggested that T-wave deviation could be an indicator of increased risk of coronary heart disease and total mortality, independently on other cardiovascular risk factors; however such data were not confirmed in middle age subjects (22,23). We used the predicted risk of CVD in the Italian population, as a markers of ischemic cardiovascular risk, by applying the individual CUORE risk score (14,15), which provides an estimate of the probability of the first coronary or cerebrovascular event in the next ten years, based on a risk function derived from several Italian cohorts (24). Estimated risk for CVD has been already used as a surrogate for CVD to evaluate the association with novel risk factors (25,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Smoking acts synergistically with other major risk factors of CVD such as age, sex, high blood pressure, dyslipidemia and diabetes. 10 This has led to the development and validation of a number of multivariable risk models which can be used by primary care physicians to assess the risk in individual patients of developing all atherosclerotic CVD [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or specific types of CVD, namely, coronary heart disease, 10,[20][21][22][23][24][25] stroke, 26 peripheral vascular disease, 27 or heart failure. 28 Multivariable assessment has been advocated to estimate absolute CVD risk and guide treatment of risk factors, 2,29 and the Framingham CVD risk assessment tool and other similar risk assessment tools have been validated 22,23,25 and also re-calibrated in other ethnically diverse populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This has led to the development and validation of a number of multivariable risk models which can be used by primary care physicians to assess the risk in individual patients of developing all atherosclerotic CVD [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] or specific types of CVD, namely, coronary heart disease, 10,[20][21][22][23][24][25] stroke, 26 peripheral vascular disease, 27 or heart failure. 28 Multivariable assessment has been advocated to estimate absolute CVD risk and guide treatment of risk factors, 2,29 and the Framingham CVD risk assessment tool and other similar risk assessment tools have been validated 22,23,25 and also re-calibrated in other ethnically diverse populations. 10,17,20,[26][27][28][29] This study seeks to examine the role of cigarette smoking as a risk factor in risk models in greater detail than the simple dichotomous yes/no variable [1][2][3] that has been incorporated in all the existing risk prediction models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%