2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of contact conditions and theoretical roughness in manufacturing of complex implants by toric grinding tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let E(t) be the ellipse resulting from the projection along P of the cutter centre-torus circle, and Redonnet et al (2013). This correct assumption in the case of machining by grinding tool like (Denkena et al 2010(Denkena et al , 2013, seems also to be correct in the case of milling at low feed rate. The notion of "low feed rate" remains largely subjective and in most cases it should be possible to use higher feed rate than it is for finishing operation due to the low depth of cut and thus low cutting forces- Tai and Fuh (1994).…”
Section: Analytical Model Of Scallop Height Context and Analytic Exprmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Let E(t) be the ellipse resulting from the projection along P of the cutter centre-torus circle, and Redonnet et al (2013). This correct assumption in the case of machining by grinding tool like (Denkena et al 2010(Denkena et al , 2013, seems also to be correct in the case of milling at low feed rate. The notion of "low feed rate" remains largely subjective and in most cases it should be possible to use higher feed rate than it is for finishing operation due to the low depth of cut and thus low cutting forces- Tai and Fuh (1994).…”
Section: Analytical Model Of Scallop Height Context and Analytic Exprmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this case, the knowledge of machining simple geometric components cannot be uncritically conferred. Frequently changing contact conditions in the grinding process should be taken into consideration in order to ensure a constant material removal and high surface quality [117].…”
Section: Surface Finishing Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of frequently changing contact conditions can be solved by precisely adjusting the tool position and varying the contact angle. Denkena et al [117] described the contact conditions in a frontal grinding of workpieces analogical to knee joints with toric grinding pins. In their work, new calculation models were developed to predict the process characteristics such as geometric contact length/width, engagement zone and the material removal rate.…”
Section: Precision Grindingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this information Ahn et al (2002) optimized polishing pressure, feed rate and tool wear. Denkena et al [15] theoretically estimated the roughness with a rigid corner-radius end-tool used in 5-axis. This model was made based on the nominal tool envelope.…”
Section: Fig 1 Production Of Knee Prosthesesmentioning
confidence: 99%