1999
DOI: 10.4141/a99-011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of composition and ruminal degradability characteristics of barley straw by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Abstract: P. 1999. Prediction of composition and ruminal degradability characteristics of barley straw by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 79: 519-523. The usefulness of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for the prediction of the nutritive value of straw was examined with 195 samples of barley straw. Excluding lignin, NIRS technique explained 84 to 94% of the variation in chemical components in the validation set. From 69 to 84% of the variation in ruminal degradability characterist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
24
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For FF, the inclusion of silages provided another factor. Silages provided more accurate predictions of DM and CP degradability parameters (de La Roza et al, 1998) than other forage sources (Todorov et al, 1994;Mathison et al, 1999). However, when silages were included to forage sources predictions were improved (Hsu et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For FF, the inclusion of silages provided another factor. Silages provided more accurate predictions of DM and CP degradability parameters (de La Roza et al, 1998) than other forage sources (Todorov et al, 1994;Mathison et al, 1999). However, when silages were included to forage sources predictions were improved (Hsu et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIRS is an accepted method to predict forage fiber traits of barley straw (Mathison et al, 1999), rice (Kong et al, 2005;Jin, 2007), green cereal crops (Bruno-Soares et al, 1998), leguminous shrubs (Garcia et al, 2004), and oat hulls (Redaelli, 2007).…”
Section: Issn: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 01 (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor prediction of the total N concentration in soybean in the present study may have been associated with the small population size (n=25) and that this material tends to be spectrally different to the other forages and crop residues. Except for total N prediction of soybean, the RPDv values obtained in the present study were higher than the values obtained in whole plant maize (Campo et al, 2013) and barley straw (Mathison et al, 1999) and comparable with the RPDv values in temperate forages (Norman et al, 2015). In general, the RPDv values obtained in the validation data set of the present study for CR quality attributes measured indicates that the better NIRS predictions of the parameters with good accuracy and further confirmed the improved predictive ability and robustness of the of chemometric models developed for DMD, Total N, NDF and ADF based on the NA dataset.…”
Section: Equation Performancecontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…Several authors are however of the opinion that RPDv values higher than 2.5 in any equation are required for an acceptable predictability (Edney et al, 1994;Mathison et al, 1999). On the other hand, Esbensen et al (2014) has been critical of the ubiquitous use of the RPDv statistic as a sole index of the quality of any NIR calibration without further criteria.…”
Section: Equation Performancementioning
confidence: 99%