2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of compaction parameters for fine-grained soil: Critical comparison of the deep learning and standalone models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building upon these traditional approaches, advanced AI methodologies have brought significant advancements in the fields of geotechnical characterization in cohesive soils. Comparative analyses have been conducted on various machine learning models and soft computing techniques to predict key soil properties such as soil compaction parameters [60]- [62], shear strength properties [63]- [67] and the suitable percentage of waste materials for soil improvement [68]. In these studies, the proposed models showed superior performance with high prediction accuracy.…”
Section: F Research Frontier Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon these traditional approaches, advanced AI methodologies have brought significant advancements in the fields of geotechnical characterization in cohesive soils. Comparative analyses have been conducted on various machine learning models and soft computing techniques to predict key soil properties such as soil compaction parameters [60]- [62], shear strength properties [63]- [67] and the suitable percentage of waste materials for soil improvement [68]. In these studies, the proposed models showed superior performance with high prediction accuracy.…”
Section: F Research Frontier Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, this relationship is identified. The two databases' correlation coefficients range (between ±) from 0.0 to 0.20, 0.21 to 0.40, 0.60 to 0.80, and 0.81 to 1.0, respectively, show extremely strong, strong, moderate, weak, and no association 49 . Figure 5 illustrates the relationship between variables present in the database in terms of the correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Soft Computing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have suggested different multicollinearity levels in terms of variance inflation factor (VIF = ). Khatti and Grover 49 have proposed different multicollinearity levels. In the present research, the variance inflation factor (VIF) has been calculated for the input variables, i.e., number of drilling holes, burden-to-diameter ratio, stiffness ratio, burden, spacing, explosive weight, scaling distance, and peak particle velocity (ground vibrations), as mentioned in Table 2 .…”
Section: Data Analysis and Soft Computing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the processing of the incomplete data, the 682 stratified data points were partitioned into a test set and a training set with the 10-fold cross-validation method [38], [39]. The soil category of the center borehole was used as the dependent variable, and the other data from the center borehole and the eight surrounding boreholes were used as the independent variables.…”
Section: B Three-dimensional Information Model For Anchor Engineering...mentioning
confidence: 99%