2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Machine-learning analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Akhmetzhan Galimzhanov,
Andrija Matetic,
Erhan Tenekecioglu
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on laboratory findings and clinical features at the time of initial treatment, three IVIG risk prediction models have been established by logistic regression analysis and verified externally 20–22 . ML can handle nonlinear input variables and therefore sometimes outperforms traditional models 51,52 . Currently, ML is used in clinical diagnosis and outcome prediction in many medical fields 53–55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on laboratory findings and clinical features at the time of initial treatment, three IVIG risk prediction models have been established by logistic regression analysis and verified externally 20–22 . ML can handle nonlinear input variables and therefore sometimes outperforms traditional models 51,52 . Currently, ML is used in clinical diagnosis and outcome prediction in many medical fields 53–55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 , 21 , 22 ML can handle nonlinear input variables and therefore sometimes outperforms traditional models. 51 , 52 Currently, ML is used in clinical diagnosis and outcome prediction in many medical fields. 53 , 54 , 55 The diagnostic criteria for IVIG resistance in KD are based on clinical parameters, and while traditional predictive models can incorporate only a small number of clinical features, models computed by ML can integrate all aspects of clinical indicators, including continuous variables, without the need for categorization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%