2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of clinical outcome in glioblastoma using a biologically relevant nine‐microRNA signature

Abstract: We have identified a novel, biologically relevant microRNA signature that stratifies high- and low-risk patients in glioblastoma. MicroRNA/mRNA interactions identified within the signature point to novel regulatory networks. This is the first study to formulate a survival risk score for glioblastoma which consists of microRNAs associated with glioblastoma biology and/or treatment response, indicating a functionally relevant signature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, they identified a specific miRNA gene signature that correlated with patient clinical outcomes for all 5 glioblastoma sub-groups. Finally, a very recent report used LASSO regression models to identify a 9-miRNA prognostic signature that significantly correlated with survival in all glioblastoma subtypes except the non-G-CIMP pro-neural group (81). Collectively, these reports suggest that stratifying each individual patient based on their differential miRNA expression signatures may result in personalized sub-class specific treatment strategies in the future.…”
Section: Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Outcome By Differential Mirnmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Importantly, they identified a specific miRNA gene signature that correlated with patient clinical outcomes for all 5 glioblastoma sub-groups. Finally, a very recent report used LASSO regression models to identify a 9-miRNA prognostic signature that significantly correlated with survival in all glioblastoma subtypes except the non-G-CIMP pro-neural group (81). Collectively, these reports suggest that stratifying each individual patient based on their differential miRNA expression signatures may result in personalized sub-class specific treatment strategies in the future.…”
Section: Predicting Glioblastoma Patient Outcome By Differential Mirnmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Meanwhile, miRNA expression profiling has been shown to distinguish the diagnosis and tumor stage of cancers more accurately than traditional mRNA analysis (64). Hundreds of studies have sought to identify miRNA serum signatures/profiles for different pathological conditions (mostly cancers); such studies have used miRNA panels to detect breast cancer (65), identify metastatic prostate cancer (66), diagnose and predict recurrence for bladder cancer (67), stratify and predict risk in glioblastoma patients (68), detect colorectal cancer (69, 70), discriminate the metastatic subtype of colorectal cancer (71), predict the prognosis and distant metastasis of colorectal cancer (72), perform early detection of pancreatic cancer (73), accurately distinguish malignant cutaneous T-cell lymphoma from benign inflammatory skin disorders (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis) (74), and association to lupus nephritis (75). Indeed, Brand et al recently showed that the use of a five-miRNA panel plus cytology improved preoperative pancreatic cancer diagnosis, correctly identifying pancreatic cancer in 91% of positive samples, compared to the 79% sensitivity seen for cytology alone.…”
Section: Ii- Biomarker Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some microRNAs have been linked to a specific GBM subtype such as the expression of miR-18 family and miR-218 which are significantly downregulated in mesenchymal subtype, whereas miR-34a has been shown to be preferentially expressed in proneural subset [19-21]. A group of nine microRNAs associated with pathobiology and therapeutic responsiveness of GBM, have been recently shown as a cluster of prognostic biomarkers [22]. Based on TCGA microRNA dataset, miR-128 can also classify more aggressive mesenchymal phenotype as its expression is significantly down regulated in this subtype compared to proneural [23].…”
Section: Micrornas and Gbm Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 99%