2000
DOI: 10.1080/10759410050031130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of Buckling-Mode Interaction in Composite Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…which includes the contribution from all the parameters in Eq. (8). However, this 1-D approach is not easily adaptable for the comparison of the doubly-symmetric and monosymmetric cross-section imperfection profiles in the current case.…”
Section: Unified Local Imperfection Measurement Criterionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which includes the contribution from all the parameters in Eq. (8). However, this 1-D approach is not easily adaptable for the comparison of the doubly-symmetric and monosymmetric cross-section imperfection profiles in the current case.…”
Section: Unified Local Imperfection Measurement Criterionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Buckling instabilities are the principal failure mode for structural members made from materials with high strength-to-weight ratios [1,2,3,4,5]. Moreover, compression members made from thin-walled plated elements are prone to suffer from a variety of different elastic instability phenomena [6,7,8,9,10]. Even though these modes may exhibit neutral or stable post-buckling behaviour when triggered individually, the interaction of these modes may lead to a dangerously unstable post-buckling behaviour [11,12,13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17). The Taylor expansion of this relationship can be written as g½d e ¼ g 1 ½d e þ 1 2 g 2 ½d e ; d e þ 1 6 g 3 ½d e ; d e ; d e þ 1 24 g 4 ½d e ; d e ; d e ; d e þ⋯ ð36Þ…”
Section: Koiter Asymptotic Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mode interaction often produces the most deleterious imperfection sensitive path with the larger drop in load carrying capacity [16][17][18]. The difficulty resides on how to select the set of modes that produces the worst behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For PFRP structural struts of sufficient slenderness that they fail by global buckling, Barbero's group, Hashem and Yuan and Seangatith and Sriboonlue have demonstrated through experimental, numerical and analytical work that the critical global buckling load can be predicted with reasonable accuracy using the classical Euler formula given by Equation . PE=π2ELCImin/0ptπ2ELCIminKLeff0.0ptKLeff2=π2ELCAgπ2ELCAgλ2λ2Where E LC = longitudinal compressive modulus; I min = weak axis moment of inertia of section; A g = gross cross section area; K = end‐restraint coefficient; L eff = effective length; and λ = KL eff / r = slenderness ratio and r = weak axis radius of gyration of section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%