2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa1ca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of breast cancer risk using a machine learning approach embedded with a locality preserving projection algorithm

Abstract: In order to automatically identify a set of effective mammographic image features and build an optimal breast cancer risk stratification model, this study aims to investigate advantages of applying a machine learning approach embedded with a locally preserving projection (LPP) based feature combination and regeneration algorithm to predict short-term breast cancer risk. A dataset involving negative mammograms acquired from 500 women was assembled. This dataset was divided into two age-matched classes of 250 hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reduce the computational complexity and feature redundancy, we carried out feature selection among features extracted in Section 3.3, using MDS (Taguchi and Oono, 2005), Locality Preserving Projection (LPP) (Heidari et al, 2018), Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) and Factor Analysis (FA) (Salas-Gonzalez et al, 2010). First, we used the maximum likelihood estimator for estimating essential dimensions.…”
Section: Effect Of Feature Selection Algorithm On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computational complexity and feature redundancy, we carried out feature selection among features extracted in Section 3.3, using MDS (Taguchi and Oono, 2005), Locality Preserving Projection (LPP) (Heidari et al, 2018), Locally Linear Embedding (LLE) and Factor Analysis (FA) (Salas-Gonzalez et al, 2010). First, we used the maximum likelihood estimator for estimating essential dimensions.…”
Section: Effect Of Feature Selection Algorithm On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Short-term breast cancer risk using the bilateral mammographic density asymmetrical features computed from the "prior" negative screening mammograms [34,47,48]; 2) Likelihood of the case being abnormal using the global image features computed from the "current" screening mammograms (case-based CAD scheme) [16,49]; 3) Response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapies using the global kinetic image features computed from the breast MRI performed before chemotherapy [40]; 4) Response of ovarian cancer patients to chemotherapy using the global adiposity-related image features computed from abdominal CT images performed before chemotherapy [30,42].…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38]). Second, a feature selection algorithm (i.e., modified sequential forward floating selection [46]) or feature regeneration algorithm (i.e., locality preserving projection [47]) is applied to search for and build an optimal feature set or vector. Third, a machine learning model (i.e., artificial neural network and support vector machine) is trained and tested.…”
Section: Prediction Of Chemotherapy Efficacy In Patients With Ovarianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) based methods have shown unprecedented success in the reliable analysis of medical images [4][5][6][7][8]. ML-based approaches are scalable, automatable, and easy to implement in clinical settings [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%