2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of brain maturity based on cortical thickness at different spatial resolutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
89
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
13
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This enabled us to divide the problem into several sub-problems with lower complexity while better retaining the original spatial resolution of the thickness measures. We hypothesized that both of these properties are important for successful predictions: Khundrakpam et al (2015) have previously demonstrated that a fine parcellation of the cortical thickness measures was advantageous for age estimation within healthy children. However, increasing spatial resolution results in higher dimensionality, which increases the complexity of the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enabled us to divide the problem into several sub-problems with lower complexity while better retaining the original spatial resolution of the thickness measures. We hypothesized that both of these properties are important for successful predictions: Khundrakpam et al (2015) have previously demonstrated that a fine parcellation of the cortical thickness measures was advantageous for age estimation within healthy children. However, increasing spatial resolution results in higher dimensionality, which increases the complexity of the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, several previous studies which were either cortical thickness (Rodrigue and Kennedy, 2011; Khundrakpam et al, 2015) or activation fMRI studies (Dosenbach et al, 2010; Qiu et al, 2015) have reported that the SM system contributes to estimate the age of young adults and aging subjects. In this study, we found that the age of older adults could be predicted by decreased rsFC value between the mid-posterior insula and primary sensorimotor cortex, as well as decreased rsFC value of mid-posterior insula resulted from ICA analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khundrakpam et al (2015) found that the top predictors of brain maturity were found in highly localized sensorimotor (precentral and postcentral gyrus, insula) and association areas (including middle and superior frontal gyrus) in normally growing children and adolescents. Similarly, Dosenbach et al (2010) reported that rsFC of SM network contributed in estimating chronological age in the typically developing volunteers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies using the concept of brain maturation index have shown promising advancement of predicting individual brain maturity in healthy children, adolescents and young adults (Brown et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2007;Dosenbach et al, 2010;Erus et al, 2014;Franke, Luders, May, Wilke, and Gaser, 2012;Khundrakpam, Tohka, and Evans, 2015), as well as aging over the human lifespan (Franke, Ziegler, Klöppel, and Gaser, 2010;Mwangi, Hasan, and Soares, 2013). By using machine learning technique and cross validation among large amount of data, these studies can account for as high as 92% of variance Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%