1993
DOI: 10.1021/ci00014a015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of boiling points of organic heterocyclic compounds using regression and neural network techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grigoras [132] furans, tetrahydrofurans the authors concluded that due to structural differences between nitrogen heterocycles and sulfur and oxygen heterocycles, various connectivity, electronic, constitutional and CPSA descriptors cannot adequately encode enough information for a combined set of heterocycles Stanton et al [134] furans, tetrahydrofurans, thiophenes, pyrans 299 MLR, NN both methods had the same quality of prediction for the training set Egolf and Jurs [135], Egolf et al [136] pyridines 572 for pyridines, in the case of the cross-validation set, the NNs outperformed conventional QSPR; descriptors that reflect hydrogen bonding and dipoledipole interactions improved the predictive models for the pyridines data set diverse organic compounds 298 for this set the back-propagation NN combination resulted in 1K improvement over the MLR alkanes 150 NN 10:7:1 architecture; the performance was slightly better in comparison with the MLR methods…”
Section: Overview Of Qspr Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grigoras [132] furans, tetrahydrofurans the authors concluded that due to structural differences between nitrogen heterocycles and sulfur and oxygen heterocycles, various connectivity, electronic, constitutional and CPSA descriptors cannot adequately encode enough information for a combined set of heterocycles Stanton et al [134] furans, tetrahydrofurans, thiophenes, pyrans 299 MLR, NN both methods had the same quality of prediction for the training set Egolf and Jurs [135], Egolf et al [136] pyridines 572 for pyridines, in the case of the cross-validation set, the NNs outperformed conventional QSPR; descriptors that reflect hydrogen bonding and dipoledipole interactions improved the predictive models for the pyridines data set diverse organic compounds 298 for this set the back-propagation NN combination resulted in 1K improvement over the MLR alkanes 150 NN 10:7:1 architecture; the performance was slightly better in comparison with the MLR methods…”
Section: Overview Of Qspr Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of descriptors. There are several possibilities for the definition of descriptors as input variables for a neural network: number of atoms, number of single bonds, molar mass, dipole moment and topological parameters concerning the connectivity between atoms [2]. In our investigation the descriptors for the input layer are the surface fractions of the functional groups within a molecule and the temperature.…”
Section: Generation and Description Of The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increased need for reliable data for optimization of industrial processes, it is important to develop reliable QSPR models to estimate normal boiling points for compounds not yet synthesized or whose boiling points are unknown. Several references [7][8][9] were made to investigations regarding the relationship between the normal boiling-point (NBP) and molecular structure descriptors. Many methods for prediction of BPs have therefore been developed, including many quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) studies using multiple linear regression (MLR) [10][11][12][13][14] and neural network (NN) Methods [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%