2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.110974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of bitterant and sweetener using structure-taste relationship models based on an artificial neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The top 2 indicators (MinEStateIndex and VSA_Estate6) were related to the van der Waals surface (Figure C,D). This was consistent with the index proposed by Bo in exploring the bitter/sweet structure–activity relationship . In the importance of the D–E amino acid matrix for umami prediction, D_E_Count was the most important indicator, followed by E_frist_index, E_count, D_first_idnex, D_E_true, and D_count.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The top 2 indicators (MinEStateIndex and VSA_Estate6) were related to the van der Waals surface (Figure C,D). This was consistent with the index proposed by Bo in exploring the bitter/sweet structure–activity relationship . In the importance of the D–E amino acid matrix for umami prediction, D_E_Count was the most important indicator, followed by E_frist_index, E_count, D_first_idnex, D_E_true, and D_count.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This was consistent with the index proposed by Bo in exploring the bitter/sweet structure−activity relationship. 9 In the importance of the D−E amino acid matrix for umami prediction, D_E_Count was the most important indicator, followed by E_frist_index, E_count, D_first_idnex, D_E_true, and D_count. In the bitter taste, E_frist_index was the most important, followed by D_E_Count, E_count, D_first_index, D_count, and D_E_true.…”
Section: Structural Analysis Of Key Molecular Fingerprints and Descri...mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At this point, the performance of the GNN declined. Nonetheless, the accuracy of flavor multiclassification is a challenging task, and our accuracy rate of 80% represented a significant improvement. In addition, the large number of peptides in the molecular set will also affect the accuracy of the models, and the taste classification of peptides and small molecules should be separated in the future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial studies mostly focused on building sweet/ non-sweet and bitter/non-bitter classification models using standard molecular descriptors from cheminformatics tools, wherein tastant databases constituted the positive set and random molecules were selected to create the negative set [5,6,7,8,9]. Later, efforts were made to address the sweet-bitter dichotomy by considering both the taste qualities [10,11,12,13]. A few studies also reported predictive models to quantify the taste intensity of molecules using properties like relative sweetness with respect to sucrose [14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%