2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of biogas production rate from dry anaerobic digestion of food waste: Process-based approach vs. recurrent neural network black-box model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two networks are commonly used in deep learning. Nevertheless, because the inside of the neural network is a black box, we can only determine which network can better meet our needs by comparing speci c problems 33,34 . Accordingly, we hoped to use different network structures to solve clinical problems to select a more suitable network structure and train a model with higher accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two networks are commonly used in deep learning. Nevertheless, because the inside of the neural network is a black box, we can only determine which network can better meet our needs by comparing speci c problems 33,34 . Accordingly, we hoped to use different network structures to solve clinical problems to select a more suitable network structure and train a model with higher accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear regression models (MLR and PLSR) were 11% of all data-driven methods applied to model anaerobic digestion processes. These methods were applied using feedstock properties (e.g., lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose content) as model input from both primary and secondary data for agricultural residue and animal waste. Apart from the limited applications of linear models, 39% of the data-driven anaerobic digestion models were based on MPR, ,,, and 41% were ANN and ANFIS ,,,, (Figure a and Table S9). These models used primary data comprised of operational parameters (e.g., temperature, hydraulic retention time) as well as the quantity of feedstocks (agricultural residue and animal waste).…”
Section: Applications Of Data Science In Rrcc From Organic Waste Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seo et al (2021) [100] tried to predict the biogas yield rate from continuous SSAD of food waste with the aid of the process-wise modeling or the neural network approach. The sludge retention time (SRT), soluble COD, total VFA, total ammonia-nitrogen (TAN) and free ammonia are used as model input.…”
Section: Advanced Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%