Prediction of Auditory Sensitivity: Small Sample Confirmation Using Acoustic Reflex Thresholds

Tsappis, Anthony

doi:10.1001/archotol.1977.00780230044004

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A pesar de que se encuentra una correlación lineal directa entre la diferencia tono-ruido contra el valor de SPAR, no se puede utilizar únicamente la diferencia tonoruido para determinar si el paciente presenta audición normal o hipoacusia, ya que se requiere aplicar el factor de corrección y la fórmula específica para que el resultado sea confiable 7,8,11 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Utilidad diagnóstica del reflejo acústico para predecir audición en población pediátrica

Pérez-Villa

Mena-Ramírez

Aguirre

et al. 2014

Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionunclassified

Utilidad diagnóstica del reflejo acústico para predecir audición en población pediátrica

Pérez-Villa

Mena-Ramírez

Aguirre

et al. 2014

Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Based on acoustic reflex findings for I 156 ears, Jerger et al (1 1) concluded that with the SPAR method, hearing loss was predicted with reasonable accuracy. Probably as a result of this initial encouraging experience with SPAR and the obvious clinical attractiveness of an objective measure for estimating hearing loss, especially in children, the literature is replete with reports of clinical experience with both the original SPAR method (1,6,7,15,(22)(23)(24) and a modified version of the SPAR (6,7,12). There are, in addition, descriptions of other, novel methods for hearing loss identification and prediction by the acoustic reflex, including regression equations (2,16,21) and a bivariate plot coordinate system (9, 17,20).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hearing Loss Prediction by the Acoustic Reflex

Hall

Bleakney

1981

Ear and Hearing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We compared the accuracy of seven methods of hearing loss prediction by the acoustic reflex in 60 subjects. The methods were two versions of Sensitivity Prediction by Acoustic Reflex, four regression equations, and the bivariate plot coordinate system. Accuracy of hearing loss prediction exceeded 60% for all methods. In general, the bivariate plot system most accurately identified hearing loss. Regression equations tended to under estimate loss. Sensitivity prediction by the acoustic reflex and the bivariate plot system tended to over predict loss. Accuracy of prediction was usually reduced in older subjects and in subjects with minor immittance abnormalities. The effect of age and immittance abnormalities, however, varied among methods.Address reprint requests to James W. Hall,

show abstract

Early identification of hearing impaired infants: Public Law 94-142 falls short

Goldstein

1979

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prediction of Auditory Sensitivity: Small Sample Confirmation Using Acoustic Reflex Thresholds

Cited by 10 publications

References 10 publications

Utilidad diagnóstica del reflejo acústico para predecir audición en población pediátrica

Utilidad diagnóstica del reflejo acústico para predecir audición en población pediátrica

Hearing Loss Prediction by the Acoustic Reflex

Early identification of hearing impaired infants: Public Law 94-142 falls short

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About