2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0mh00183j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction of a two-dimensional high-TC f-electron ferromagnetic semiconductor

Abstract: Two-dimensional (2D) ferromagnetic semiconductors (FMSs) exhibit novel spin-dependent electronic and optical properties, opening up exciting opportunities for nanoscale spintronic devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
149
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially for the first ones, the layered structures should turn out as particularly useful for making almost 2D-like crystals, which would provide additional potential as multifunctional compounds. [38] Nonlinear Optics…”
Section: Photochemical Water Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for the first ones, the layered structures should turn out as particularly useful for making almost 2D-like crystals, which would provide additional potential as multifunctional compounds. [38] Nonlinear Optics…”
Section: Photochemical Water Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a)), much larger than those of bulk Fe (0.001meV per atom), and Ni (0.003meV per atom) [64], and larger than that of the Fe monolayer on Rh (111) (0.08meV per atom) [65], suggesting the thermal stability of the magnetization of the Mn3Br8 monolayer. The relationship between the MCE and the azimuthal angle can be described by the following equation [66]: We further calculated the C T for FM Mn3Br8 monolayer by performing the Monte Carlo (MC) simulations based on the Heisenberg model, which has been proven to be the effective method for predicting C T for 2D materials [11,15,48,59,[67][68][69][70][71][72]. Our estimated C T of CrI3 monolayer is 42K [72], agreeing well with the experimental measured value [2] and previous calculation results [15,59,67,68,70,72], which proves the accuracy of our adopted method.…”
Section: Cleavage Energy Ground State and Stability Of The Mnbr 2 Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the MAE of Mn 3 Br 8 monolayer is much larger than that of MnBr 2 monolayer, proving again the effectiveness of our design. We further calculated the T c for FM Mn 3 Br 8 monolayer by performing the Monte Carlo (MC) simulations based on the Heisenberg model, which has been proven to be the effective method for predicting T c for 2D materials [11,15,48,58,[71][72][73][74][75][76]. Our estimated T c of CrI 3 monolayer is 42 K (Additional file 1: Fig.…”
Section: Cleavage Energy Ground State and Stability Of The Mnbr 2 Monolayermentioning
confidence: 99%