2018
DOI: 10.1159/000496563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Models for Early Childhood Obesity: Applicability and Existing Issues

Abstract: Statistical models have been developed for the prediction or diagnosis of a wide range of outcomes. However, to our knowledge, only 7 published studies have reported models to specifically predict overweight and/or obesity in early childhood. These models were developed using known risk factors and vary greatly in terms of their discrimination and predictive capacities. There are currently no established guidelines on what constitutes an acceptable level of risk (i.e., risk threshold) for childhood obesity pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The joint combination of all models individually surpassing an AUC of 0.6 yielded a considerable improvement in the predictive ability (AUC = 0.81 CI 95% = [0.7-0.93]), which could be sufficient for clinical discrimination. All these results are in concordance with previous insights from Butler et al, (2019) [44], who demonstrated that early clinical factors, including maternal age, prepregnancy maternal (and paternal) BMI, birthweight, gestational age, weight gain during early infancy and other easily and measurable factors, do fairly well in predicting childhood obesity. Moreover, these results suggest that the combination of a high-risk genetic profile along with an unhealthy familial environment (represented in terms of parents BMI and obesity family history) could boost the predisposition to the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The joint combination of all models individually surpassing an AUC of 0.6 yielded a considerable improvement in the predictive ability (AUC = 0.81 CI 95% = [0.7-0.93]), which could be sufficient for clinical discrimination. All these results are in concordance with previous insights from Butler et al, (2019) [44], who demonstrated that early clinical factors, including maternal age, prepregnancy maternal (and paternal) BMI, birthweight, gestational age, weight gain during early infancy and other easily and measurable factors, do fairly well in predicting childhood obesity. Moreover, these results suggest that the combination of a high-risk genetic profile along with an unhealthy familial environment (represented in terms of parents BMI and obesity family history) could boost the predisposition to the disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In fact, the link between childhood and adulthood obesity is a well-established target for obesity prevention, inspiring the development of other models to predict childhood obesity at birth. Early clinical factors, including maternal age, pre-pregnancy maternal (and paternal) BMI, birth weight, gestational age, weight gain during early infancy, and other easily and measurable factors, do fairly well in predicting childhood obesity (Butler et al, 2019). It is not known how much these risk factors overlap with genetic factors, though the experience with other PRSs would suggest they are partially overlapping and complementary.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey has been done for predicting obesity using machine learning classifiers, and the performance has been calculated using three parameters -sensitivity, specificity, and ROC. However, the study did not conclude which classifier is best [25]. The Naive Bayesian and decision tree have been used to predictive the obesity, the increase of 20% is noted via Naïve Bayesian (NB) Tree [26].…”
Section: Applications Of Data Mining On Chronic Diseases Analysis Andmentioning
confidence: 99%