2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06247-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction model for intracranial hypertension demonstrates robust performance during external validation on the CENTER-TBI dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Carra and colleagues undertook the validation testing of Gaussian processes (GPs)-based predictive modeling using the high-resolution CENTER-TBI data set. 10 These algorithms demonstrated good intercenter robustness, with the model achieving an accuracy of 88%, sensitivity of 83%, and specificity of 91% in providing a 30-min forewarning of an ICP crisis (defined as an ICP >30 mm Hg lasting at least 10 consecutive min). However, using GPs, though promising with retrospective data, is computationally intensive and requires 4 h of input data to allow it to make a prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, Carra and colleagues undertook the validation testing of Gaussian processes (GPs)-based predictive modeling using the high-resolution CENTER-TBI data set. 10 These algorithms demonstrated good intercenter robustness, with the model achieving an accuracy of 88%, sensitivity of 83%, and specificity of 91% in providing a 30-min forewarning of an ICP crisis (defined as an ICP >30 mm Hg lasting at least 10 consecutive min). However, using GPs, though promising with retrospective data, is computationally intensive and requires 4 h of input data to allow it to make a prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their model had a classification accuracy of 77%, a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 75% in the first validation cohort. The model was later validated on two other cohorts of adult TBI patients; 151 subjects part of a multicenter study including five centers 21 and 257 other subjects recruited as part of the CENTER-TBI high-resolution ICU monitoring cohort 22 . The precision varies somewhat between the cohorts (sensitivity/specificity 70/90% and 83/91% respectively) but are overall in the same range as the ones found with our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this and all subsequent studies by Güiza and associates, a tIH event was classified as a rise in ICP ≥30 mm Hg that lasted for at least 10 min. 59 , 69 , 70 …”
Section: Tih Prediction Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%