2019
DOI: 10.1167/19.6.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction errors in surface segmentation are reflected in the visual mismatch negativity, independently of task and surface features

Abstract: visual surface segmentation leads to observable electrophysiological signals of prediction error that are dissociable from stimulus-specific encoding and lowerlevel perceptual processing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, PHT matching low level sensory features, such as gratings (Kok et al, 2012), to hypotheses about such low level features should occur at earlier stages in the processing hierarchy. These PHT processes maybe reflected in other ERP components, such as the visual mismatch negativity (Oxner et al, 2019), or even earlier ERP components that index expected features, like the P1 (Boutonnet & Lupyan, 2015).…”
Section: The N300 Indexes Perceptual Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, PHT matching low level sensory features, such as gratings (Kok et al, 2012), to hypotheses about such low level features should occur at earlier stages in the processing hierarchy. These PHT processes maybe reflected in other ERP components, such as the visual mismatch negativity (Oxner et al, 2019), or even earlier ERP components that index expected features, like the P1 (Boutonnet & Lupyan, 2015).…”
Section: The N300 Indexes Perceptual Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two articles in the Special Issue provide evidence for high-level predictive representations using EEG. Oxner et al (2019) show that prediction errors in surface segmentation are associated with visual mismatch negativity and with the P2 wave in the event-related potential. Based on amplitude differences in the error-related negativity, Maurer et al (2019) suggest that the brain generates error predictions that can dissociate relevant from irrelevant errors and that relevant errors lead to larger behavioral adjustments than irrelevant ones.…”
Section: Predicting Sensory Changes In the Worldmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In a study of MMN, Clifford et al proposed a visual mismatching negative wave (vMMN) when investigating the changes of brain in the process of color perception, providing possible evidence for the classification and coding of color pre-attention [40]. Oxner et al proposed that changes in the layout of an interface would cause changes in MMN, P2-N2, and P300 [41]. However, MMN is mainly caused by hearing, and the classical MMN differential wave can be obtained in the classical Oddball paradigm.…”
Section: Eeg Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the amplitude of P300 was analyzed, and the absolute values of the average amplitude of each color in the blue series followed the order of: blue 4 P300 generally occurs in the parietal lobe. In this study, P3, P4, CP1, CP2, Pz, and POz were chosen based on the selection of electrodes in the experimental study of P300 conducted by our predecessors [24,41,42] and the significance of the amplitude of each electrode in the EEG.…”
Section: Blue Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%