2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0022029916000364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction efficiency by near-infrared spectroscopy of immunoglobulin G in liquid and dried bovine colostrum samples

Abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the prediction efficiency of IgG concentration in bovine colostrum by NIRS, using liquid and dried (Dry-Extract Spectroscopy for Infrared Reflectance, DESIR) samples by transflectance and reflectance modes, respectively. Colostrum samples (157), obtained from 2 commercial Holstein dairy farms, were collected within the first hour after calving and kept at -20 °C until analysis. After thawing and homogenisation, a subsample of 500 mg of liquid colostrum was placed in a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selected PLS model was based on the first-order derivatives spectra with nine points and SNV normalization. This 14-PLS calibration model has a similar number of PLS factors to that previously built by the authors for dairy cow colostrum (Elsohaby et al, 2016) and higher than that built for near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy (Rivero et al, 2012(Rivero et al, , 2016. a PLS factors = number of partial least squares factors; RMMCCV = root mean squared error for the Monte Carlo cross-validation value (g/L); N = number of colostrum samples; r = Pearson correlation coefficient; ccc = concordance correlation coefficient; RMSEC = root mean squared error of calibration (g/L); RMSEP = root mean squared error of prediction; RE% = relative error % ((TIR-IgG value − RID-IgG value)/RID-IgG value × 100); CV% = intra-assay CV % ((SD/mean) × 100); RPD = ratio of predictive deviation (SD of RID-IgG/RMSEP); RER = range error ratio (range of RID-IgG/RMSEP).…”
Section: Pls Calibration For Dairy Cow Colostrum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The selected PLS model was based on the first-order derivatives spectra with nine points and SNV normalization. This 14-PLS calibration model has a similar number of PLS factors to that previously built by the authors for dairy cow colostrum (Elsohaby et al, 2016) and higher than that built for near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy (Rivero et al, 2012(Rivero et al, , 2016. a PLS factors = number of partial least squares factors; RMMCCV = root mean squared error for the Monte Carlo cross-validation value (g/L); N = number of colostrum samples; r = Pearson correlation coefficient; ccc = concordance correlation coefficient; RMSEC = root mean squared error of calibration (g/L); RMSEP = root mean squared error of prediction; RE% = relative error % ((TIR-IgG value − RID-IgG value)/RID-IgG value × 100); CV% = intra-assay CV % ((SD/mean) × 100); RPD = ratio of predictive deviation (SD of RID-IgG/RMSEP); RER = range error ratio (range of RID-IgG/RMSEP).…”
Section: Pls Calibration For Dairy Cow Colostrum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 84%