2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and optimizing of methylene blue sequestration to activated charcoal/magnetic nanocomposites using artificial neutral network and response surface methodology

Uyiosa Osagie Aigbe,
Thabang Calvin Lebepe,
Oluwatobi Samuel Oluwafemi
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the statistical results obtained in this work, the ANN model was the least efficient in terms of precision and accuracy in estimating the benzaldehyde yield, while the ANFIS model was better than the ANN model. The structure where the error value approaches zero (0) and the superlative R 2 -value is near 1 is the acceptable exceptional model performance . Therefore, the error analysis revealed the superiority of ANFIS at simulating the oxidation process of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde over RSM and ANN techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the statistical results obtained in this work, the ANN model was the least efficient in terms of precision and accuracy in estimating the benzaldehyde yield, while the ANFIS model was better than the ANN model. The structure where the error value approaches zero (0) and the superlative R 2 -value is near 1 is the acceptable exceptional model performance . Therefore, the error analysis revealed the superiority of ANFIS at simulating the oxidation process of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde over RSM and ANN techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the observed high values of R , R 2 , and adjusted R 2 are indicative of the good fit of the models . For a model to be adjudged reliable and acceptable, its R 2 value must be greater than 0.8. , Consequently, the adjusted R 2 was used to check the overestimation of the R 2 . The obtained adjusted R 2 values were sufficiently very close to R 2 , which further validated the correctness and accuracy of the predicted models .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations