2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2001.8128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and Measurement of the Interparticle Depletion Interaction Next to a Flat Wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental measurements of depletion force performed by Piech et al [29] support this estimation. Using the hydrodynamic force balance apparatus, Piech et al measured the depletion force to be −0.04 mN/m between 10 µm particles in suspensions of nanoparticles having a diameter of 20 to 40 nm.…”
Section: Structural Effects Caused By Silica Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental measurements of depletion force performed by Piech et al [29] support this estimation. Using the hydrodynamic force balance apparatus, Piech et al measured the depletion force to be −0.04 mN/m between 10 µm particles in suspensions of nanoparticles having a diameter of 20 to 40 nm.…”
Section: Structural Effects Caused By Silica Nanoparticlessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The attractive depletion force arises whenever the concentration of polymers, micelles or nanoparticles in a thin liquid film is reduced to that in the bulk. This entropic attraction is caused by imbalance of the osmotic pressure of the polymers, micelles or nanoparticles acting on the larger particle (colloidal probe in the case of our system) and has been the topic of numerous studies [22,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Because a small attractive interaction between the glass probe and silicon wafer was also observed in the experiments with deionized water, the depletion effects are most likely not responsible for the step at ∼5 nm.…”
Section: Structural Effects Caused By Silica Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The other effect is the premature separation of the doublet caused by the random force that happens to be in the same direction as the hydrodynamic force and thus results in a separation prior to the establishment of the force balance between the hydrodynamic and the colloidal forces. This stochastic nature of doublet breakup has been discussed in detail elsewhere (20). It has been found that the resulting error is significant only if the energy minimum is shallower than 2 kT.…”
Section: Effects Of Droplet Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This corresponds to a determined F coll /a value of 0.1-0.2 µN/m in the data presented in this paper. The actual values of F coll /a could be 50% larger than the determined ones (20). As the determined F coll /a value becomes larger than 0.2 µN/m, the random force effect diminishes and is neglected in this work.…”
Section: Effects Of Droplet Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Accordingly, more force is required to break this physical network as the nanopigment level increases. The multifunctionality (carboxyl, ester, and vinyl groups) of PSBA molecules may act as bridges between the latex matrix and BaSO 4 nanoparticles, avoiding the depletion force-induced phase separation [26] during in situ polymerization. Above critical loading of nanopigments, creation of regions of heterogeneity due to the formation of agglomerates of nanoBaSO 4 in matrix is responsible for the reduction in tensile strength.…”
Section: Glass Transition Temperature Of Latex Nanocompositementioning
confidence: 99%