2017
DOI: 10.2174/1386207320666170314094951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and Identification of Krüppel-Like Transcription Factors by Machine Learning Method

Abstract: Two classification models for KLFs prediction have been built by novel machine learning methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Charos et al utilized ChIP-seq to obtain PPARGC1A binding sites across the genome in hepatoma cells HepG2 [ 10 ]. Conserved motif analysis [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] showed that the majority of PPARGC1A binding sites are located in multiple regulatory factor binding regions including RNAPII. Additionally, these regions are frequently located at the promoter of target genes, such as genes CEBPB [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Charos et al utilized ChIP-seq to obtain PPARGC1A binding sites across the genome in hepatoma cells HepG2 [ 10 ]. Conserved motif analysis [ 39 , 40 , 41 ] showed that the majority of PPARGC1A binding sites are located in multiple regulatory factor binding regions including RNAPII. Additionally, these regions are frequently located at the promoter of target genes, such as genes CEBPB [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Table 1 , the number of sites contributing to the construction of motif 1 only 47, which may result in a great deal of false positive results. Therefore, it would be practicable to turn to the machine learning-based methods and has been proved to be effective in many fields [ 26 , 31 46 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%